Using Digital Technologies to Support Inclusion in the Mainstream Classroom

Authors

  • Alicia Woods

Keywords:

Inclusion, Universal Design for Learning, UDL, Digital Technologies

Abstract

This article presents an account of an action research project I undertook as part of the fnal year of my Bachelor of Education (B.Ed.) degree. Using Universal Design for Learning (UDL) (http://www.cast.org/our-work/aboutudl.html#.XKuBFtL0nIU) as a guiding framework, I explored how digital technologies can be used to support inclusion in the mainstream classroom by providing multiple means of representation, action and expression. The starting point to the research entailed a review of literature relating to UDL and the use of digital technologies to support UDL. From this, I extracted a set of seven codes which were subsequently used as a tool to analyse a set of planning documents from a previous school placement. Building on the fndings of the analysis and guided by the UDL framework, I redesigned my main planning document (progressional scheme) to ensure a more inclusive practice. A range of online resources was embedded throughout the scheme to support inclusion.

References

Adams, S., Burns, M. (1999). Connecting Student Learning and Technology. Technology Assistance Program. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.

Alberta Teachers’ Association. (2000). The Action Research Process. Edmonton, Alberta.

Bernacchio, C., & Mullen, M. (2007). Universal Design for Learning. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 31(2): 167-169. DOI: 10.2975/31.2.2007.167.169.

CAST (2018). Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.2 [graphic organizer] Wakefield, MA: Author. http://udlguidelines.cast.org/binaries/content/assets/udlguidelines/udlg-V2-2/udlg_graphicorganizer_v2-2_numbers-no.pdf

CAST (2011). Universal design for learning guidelines. Version 2.0. Wakefield, MA: Author. http://www.udlcenter.org/sites/udlcenter.org/files/updateguidelines2_0.pdf.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education. (8th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

Collins, A., Halverson, R. (2009). Rethinking Education in the Age of Technology. The Digital Revolution and Schooling in America. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Collins, A., Halverson, R. (2010). The second educational revolution: rethinking education in the age of technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Cosgrove, J., Butler, D., Leahy, M., Shiel, G., Kavanagh, L. & Creaven, A. (2014). The 2013 ICT Census in Schools Summary Report. http://www.erc.ie/documents/ict_cencus2013_summaryreport.pdf.

Dean, T., Lee-Post, A., & Hapke, H. (2016). Universal Design for Learning in Teaching Large Lecture Classes. Journal of Marketing Education, 39(1): 5-16. https://doi-org.dcu.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/0273475316662104.

DES. (2015). Digital Strategy for Schools 2015-2020: Enhancing teaching, learning and assessment. Retrieved from https://www.education.ie/en/publications/policy-reports/Digital-Strategy-for-Schools-2015-2020.pdf.

Heelan, A. (2015). Universal Design for Learning (UDL): Implications for Education. Universal Design in Education. Dublin, Ireland, 12-13 November.

Huang, H.M., Rauch, U., & Liaw, S.S. (2010). Investigating leaners' attitudes toward virtual reality learning environments: Based on a constructivist approach. Computers and Education. 55: 1171-1182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.014.

King-Sears, M. (2009). Universal Design for Learning: Technology and Pedagogy. Learning Disability Quarterly. 32(2): 199-201.

O’Neill, G., Moore, S. and McMullin, B. (2005). Student-centred learning: what does it mean for students and lecturer? Emerging Issues in the Practice of University Learning and Teaching. Dublin: AISHE: 27-36.

Pisha, B. & Coyne, P. (2001). Smart From the Start. The Promise of Universal Design for Learning. Remedial and Special Education. 22(4), 197-203. DOI: 10.1177/074193250102200402.

Rose, D., Gavel, J., & Domings, Y. (2010). UDL Unplugged: The Role of Technology in UDL. http://www.udlcenter.org/sites/udlcenter.org/files/UDL-TECH%20BRIEFfinal.pdf.

Sayyed Obaid, M. A. (2013). The Impact of Using Multi-Sensory Approach for Teaching Students with Learning Disabilities. Journal o International Education Research. 9(1): 75-82.

Somekh, B., Zeichner, K. (2009). Action research for educational reform: remodelling action research theories and practices in local contexts. Educational Action Research. 17(1): 5-21 DOI: 10.1080/09650790802667402.

The Teaching Council. (2016). The Code of Professional Conduct for Teachers

(Updated 2nd ed.). Retrieved from http://www.teachingcouncil.ie/en/

Publications/Fitness-to-Teach/Code-of-Professionalonduct-for-Teachers1.pdf.

Trostle Brand, S., Favazza, A., & Dalton, E. (2012). Universal Design for Learning: A Blueprint for Success for All Leaners. Kappa Delta Pi Record. 48(3), 134-139. DOI: 10.1080/00228958.2012.707506.

Vitelli, E.M. (2015). Universal Design For Learning: Are we teaching it to preservice

general education teachers? Journal of Special Education Technology. 30(3):

-178. DOI: 10.1177/0162643415618931.

Downloads

Published

2022-02-14

How to Cite

Woods, A. (2022). Using Digital Technologies to Support Inclusion in the Mainstream Classroom. REACH: Journal of Inclusive Education in Ireland, 32(2), 102–124. Retrieved from https://reachjournal.ie/index.php/reach/article/view/11

Issue

Section

Articles