Maths textbooks and inclusive practices in the teaching of maths in the senior classes of primary schools in Ireland.

Authors

  • Michelle Duffy Dublin City University
  • Catherine Brennan

Keywords:

maths, maths teaching practices, maths textbook, primary school, senior classes, inclusion, differentiation, team teaching, ability grouping, professional development

Abstract

This article reports the findings from a small-scale study that sought the opinions of both class teachers (CTs) and special education teachers (SETs) on the use of maths textbooks as a teaching tool in 4th, 5th and 6th classes in Irish primary schools and determined what inclusive practices are being used by teachers to support pupils with learning difficulties in maths. This study demonstrated that the textbook is widely used by teachers in the senior classes of primary school and is seen as an important tool, influencing planning, teaching methods and teaching practices. The study highlights the didactic teacher led approaches that are being used by teachers and that despite good intentions exclusive rather than inclusive practices are being used by most teachers in the study. Emerging from the findings is the need for professional development in order to change and improve the mindset, approaches and teaching of maths for all pupils.

References

REFERENCE LIST

Alim, J., Hermita, N., Alim, M., Wijaya, T., & Pereira, J. (2021). Developing a math

textbook using realistic mathematics education approach to increase elementary

students’ learning motivation. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 9(2), 193-201.

doi:https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v9i2.39393

Bernstein, B (1971). On the classification and framing of educational knowledge. In M.F.D.

Young (Eds.), Knowledge and control (pp.47–69). London: Collier-Macmillan.

Boaler, J. (2015). The elephant in the classroom: Helping children learn and love maths.

Great Britain: Souvenir Press.

Civil, M. (2002). Chapter 4: Everyday mathematics, mathematicians' mathematics, and school

mathematics: Can we bring them together? Journal for Research in Mathematics

Education. Monograph 11, 40-62. https://doi-org.dcu.idm.oclc.org/10.2307/749964

Cheeseman, J., & Klooger, M. (2018). Mathematics teachers: Dealing with difference.

Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 23(3), 27-29.

Clarke, D., & Clarke, B. A. (2008). Is time up for ability grouping? EQ Australia, 6(5), 31–

Creswell, J.W. (2012) Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating

quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education

Department of Education and Skills (DES) (2005). An evaluation of curriculum

implementation in primary schools – English, mathematics and visual arts. Dublin,

Ireland: Stationary Office

Dooley, T. (2019). Learning and teaching primary mathematics. An Addendum to NCCA

Research Reports 17 and 18. Retrieved from

https://ncca.ie/media/4087/primary_maths_research_addendum_2019.pdf

Dunphy, E. (2009). Do mathematics textbooks or workbooks enhance the teaching of

mathematics in early childhood? Views of teachers of four- and five-year-old

children in primary schools in Ireland. In Proceedings of the third national conference

of research in mathematics education MEI3. Theme: Mathematics for all: Extending

mathematical capacity.

https://www.dcu.ie/sites/default/files/institute_of_education/pdfs/mei3-proceedings.pdf

Eivers, E., Close, S., Shiel, G., Millar, D., Clerkin, A. Gilleece, L., & Kiniry, J. (2010). The

National Assessments of English Reading and Mathematics. Dublin: Educational

Research Centre. Accessed at: http://www.erc.ie/documents/na2009_report.pdf

Engelbrecht, P. (2013). Teacher education for inclusion, international perspectives. European

Journal of Special Needs Education, 28(2), 115-118,

DOI: 10.1080/08856257.2013.778110

Fan, L., Zhu, Y. & Miao, Z. (2013). Textbook research in mathematics education:

development status and directions. ZDM Mathematics Education 45, 633–646.

https://doi-org.dcu.idm.oclc.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0539-x

Florian, L. (2010). “The Concept of Inclusive Pedagogy.” In Transforming the Role of the

SENCO (pp.61–72). Buckingham: Open University Press.

Florian, L., & Spratt, J. (2013). Enacting inclusion: A framework for interrogating inclusive

practice. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 28(2), 119–135.

doi:10.1080/08856257.2013.778111.

Geary, D.C. (1994). Improving mathematical instruction and remediation. In American

Psychological Association (Eds). Children’s mathematical development: Research

and practical applications (pp. 261–288).

https://doi-org.dcu.idm.oclc.org/10.1037/10163-008

Haribson, L. (2009). The use of mathematics textbooks to promote understanding in the

lower primary year. In Proceedings of the third national conference of research in

mathematics education MEI3. Theme: Mathematics for all: Extending mathematical

capacity.

https://www.dcu.ie/sites/default/files/institute_of_education/pdfs/mei3-proceedings.pdf

Hart, S., & Drummond, M.J., (2014). Learning without limits: Constructing a pedagogy free

from determinist beliefs about ability. In L. Florian (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of

special education (2nd edition), (pp. 500-515). London: SAGE.

Hudson, B., Henderson, S., & Hudson, A. (2015). Developing mathematical thinking in the

primary classroom: Liberating students and teachers as learners of mathematics.

Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(3), 374-398. DOI: 10.1080/00220272.2014.979233

Kavanagh, L., Shiel, G., & Gilleece L., with Kiniry, J. (2015) The 2014 National Assessments

of English Reading and Mathematics. Volume 2: Context Report. Dublin: Educational

Research Centre.

Karp, K., & Howell, P. (2004). Building Responsibility for Learning in Students with Special

Needs. Teaching Children Mathematics, 11(3), 118-126. Retrieved from

http://www.jstor.org/stable/41198461

Kikas, E., Peets, K. & Hodges, E. (2014). Collective student characteristics alter the effects of

teaching practices on academic outcomes. Journal of Applied Developmental

Psychology, 35, 273-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.04.004

Lindsay, G. (2007). Educational psychology and the effectiveness on inclusive education/

mainstreaming. British Journal of Educational psychology, 77(1), 1-24.

Lovin, L., Kyger, M., & Allsopp, D. (2004). Differentiation for Special Needs Learners. Teaching

Children Mathematics, 11(3), 158-167. Retrieved from

http://www.jstor.org/stable/41198468

Macintyre, T. & Hamilton, S. (2010). Mathematics learners and mathematics textbooks: A

question of identity? Whose curriculum? Whose mathematics? Curriculum Journal,

(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170903558244

Mili & Winch, C. (2019). Teaching through textbooks: Teachers as practitioners of a

discipline? Theory & Research in Education, 17 (2), 181 – 201.

https://doi-org.dcu.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/1477878519862547

Mulholland, M. & O’Connor, U. (2016). Collaborative classroom practice for inclusion:

Perspectives of classroom teachers and learning support / resource teachers.

International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20 (10), p. 1070-1083. Retrieved by:

https://doi-org.dcu.idm.oclc.org/10.1080/13603116.2016.1145266

National Council for Curriculum and Assessment (NCCA) (2016). Background paper and

brief for the development of a new Primary Mathematics Curriculum. Dublin: NCCA

National Council for Curriculum and Assessment (NCCA) (2018). Consultation report on the

primary mathematics curriculum for junior infants to second class. Dublin: NCCA

Retrieved from: https://ncca.ie/media/3605/pmc_consultation_report_july2018.pdf

NicMhuiri, S. 2012. Does it go without saying? Mathematical thinking in whole class

discourse (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). DCU, Dublin. Retrieved from Doras,

DCU Online Research Access Services (http://doras.dcu.ie/22554/)

O’Shea, J., & Leavy A.M. (2013). Teaching mathematical problem-solving from an emergent

constructivist perspective: The experiences of Irish primary teachers. Journal of

Mathematics Teacher Education 16, 293–318. DOI: 10.1007/s10857-013-9235-6

Pakarinen, E., & Kikas, E. (2019). Child-centred and teacher-directed practices in relation to

calculations and word problem solving skills. Learning and Individual Differences,

, 76-85. https://doi-org.dcu.idm.oclc.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.01.008

Remillard, J. T. (2000). Can curriculum materials support teachers’ learning? Two fourth-

grade teachers’ use of a new mathematics text. The Elementary School Journal, 100

(4), 331–350.

Rose, R., Shevlin, M., Winter, E., & O’Raw P. (2015). Project IRIS – Inclusive research in

Irish schools. A longitudinal study of the experiences of and outcomes for pupils with

special educational needs (SEN) in Irish schools. Trim: NCSE

Schoenfeld, A.H. (1988). When good teaching leads to bad results: The disasters of 'well-

taught' mathematics courses. Educational Psychologist, 23(2), 145-166

DOI: 10.1207/s15326985ep2302_5

Schoenfeld, A. (2004). The math wars. Educational Policy, 18(1), 253-286.

Shield, M. & Dole, S. (2013). Assessing the potential of mathematics textbooks to promote

deep learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics 82, 183–199.

Retrieved from https://doi-org.dcu.idm.oclc.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9415-9

Small, M. (2017). Great ways to differentiate mathematics. Instruction in the standards-

based classroom (3rd edition). New York: Teachers College Press

Timperley, H., Wilson A., Barrar, H., and Fung I. (2008). Teacher professional learning and

development: Best evidence synthesis iteration. A Report for the New Zealand

Ministry of Education. Retrieved from: http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/data/assets/pdf_file/0017/16901/TPLandDBESentireWeb.pdf.

Travers, J. (2011). Teachers’ organisational practices and their perceptions of the benefits of

support by withdrawal for mathematics in Irish primary schools. European Journal of

Special Needs Education, 26 (4), 461 – 477.

Treacy, M. (2017). Spoon-Feeding to Tongue-Biting and Beyond: Factors That Contributed

to Changes in Irish Primary School Teachers’ Mathematics Practice. Irish

Educational Studies, 36(3), 375–397. DOI: 10.1080/03323315.2017.1333443

Usiskin, Z. (2013). Studying textbooks in an information age—a United States

perspective. ZDM Mathematics Education 45, 713–723

https://doi-org.dcu.idm.oclc.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0514-6

Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2000). Mathematics education in the Netherlands: A guided

tour. Freudenthal Institute Cd-Rom for ICME9. Utrecht: Utrecht University.

Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen M., Drijvers P. (2020) Realistic Mathematics Education. In:

Lerman S. (Eds) Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_170

Vincent, J., & Stacey, K. (2008). Do mathematics textbooks cultivate shallow teaching?

Applying the TIMSS video study criteria to Australian eighth-grade mathematics

textbooks. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(1), 81–106.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.

Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Walton, E., & Moonsamy, S. (2015). Making education inclusive. England: Cambridge

Scholars Publisher

Winter, E. & O’ Raw, P. (2010). Literature review on the principles and practices relating

to inclusive education for children with special educational needs. Trim: NCSE

World Economic Forum (2020). The future of jobs report. Part 1: Preparing for the

workforce of the fourth industrial revolution. New York, NY: Author. Retrieved from

https://reports.weforum.org/future-of-jobs-2016/skills-stability/

Downloads

Published

2022-10-28

How to Cite

Duffy, M., & Brennan, C. (2022). Maths textbooks and inclusive practices in the teaching of maths in the senior classes of primary schools in Ireland . REACH: Journal of Inclusive Education in Ireland, 35(1). Retrieved from https://reachjournal.ie/index.php/reach/article/view/330