The Early Identification of Learning Difficulties
Keywords:
Assessment, Learning Difficulties, Early Identification, Screening, Individualised Learing, Tutoring, Infant Screening Devices, TestingAbstract
The value of early screening for learning difficulties combined with intensive individual tutoring is attested frequently in research literature. Despite the difficulties inherent in the construction and validity of infant screening devices, teachers find them useful as they provide help in understanding children's learning. A description of three tests currently available in Ireland opens a discussion on the selection and usefulness of such instruments.
References
Adams, M.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Archer, P., & Edwards, J.R. (1982). Predicting school achievement from data on children obtained from teachers: Towards a screening device for disadvantage. Journal of Educational Psychology, 5,761-770.
Barrs, M., Ellis, S., Hester, H., & Thomas, A. (1993). Guide to the primary learning record. London: Centre for Language in Primary Education.
Boehm, A. (1986). Boehm Test of Basic Concepts (Revised). New York: The Psychological Corporation.
Bradley, L., & Bryant, P.E. (1983). Categorising sounds and learning to read - A causal connection. Nature, 301,419-421.
Brimer, A., & Raban, B. (1979). The Infant Reading Tests. Newham, Glos.: Education Evaluation Enterprises. (Available from the Test Department, ERC, 66 Richmond Road, Dublin 3).
Clay,M. (1985). The early detection of reading difficulties (3rd ed.). New Zealand: Heinemann Education.
Clay, M. (1993). The reading recovery programme, 1984-88: Coverage, outcomes and Education Board district figures. Oideas, 40, 21-34.
Clerehugh, J., Hart, K., Pither, R., Rider, K., & Turner, K. (1991). EYES: Early Years Easy Screen. Windsor: NFER-NELSON.
Crossland, H. (1994). Screening early literacy: Ideology, illusion and intervention. Educational Review, 46, 47-62.
Department of Education, 1993. Report of the Special Education Review Committee. Dublin: Government Publications.
Department of Education and Science. (1975). Language for life: The Bullock Report. London: HMSO.
Department of Education and Science. (1978). Special Education Needs. (Warnock Report) London: HMSO.
Ireland, 1992. Education for a changing world: Green paper on Education. Dublin: Government Publications.
Jorm, A.F., Share, D.L., Maclean, R., & Matthews, R. (1986). Cognitive factors at school entry predictive of specific reading retardation and general reading backwardness: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 27, 45-65.
Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of forty-four children from first through fourth grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437-447.
Kennedy, M.M., Birman, B.F., & Dermaline, R.E. (1986). The effectiveness of Chapter 1 services. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U. S. Department of Education.
Leach, D.J. (1983). Early screening procedures: A critical analysis of their utility and their role in prevention. School Psychology International, 4, 47-56.
Lindsay, G.A. (1980). The Infant Rating Scale. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 50, 97-104.
Lindsay, G.A. (1988). The identification of special educational needs: Screening and Beyond. School Psychology International, 9, 61-68
Lindsay, G. A. & Wedell,K. (1982). The early identification of educationally "at risk" children revisited. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15, 212-217.
Newton, M., & Thomson, M. (1982). Aston Index-Revised. Cambridge:Learning Development Aids.
Novack, H.S., Bonaventura, E., & Merenda, P.F. (1982). Rhode Island Profile of Early Learning Behaviour. Providence, R. I.: Jamestown Publishers.
Pearson, L., & Quinn, J. (1986). The Bury Infant Check. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.
Pinell, G.S., Lyons, C.A., Deford, D.E., Bryk, A.S., & Seltzer, M. (1994). Comparing instructional models for the literacy education of high-risk first graders. Reading Research Quarterly, 29, 8-39.
Porteous, M. (1991). Review of the Aston Index. In Harding, L, & Beach, J.R. (Eds.)., Educational assessment of the primary child (161-162). Windsor: NFER-Nelson.
Potton, A. (1983). Screening. London: Macmillan Education.
Powell, D. (1991). Towards a primary record of achievement. British Journal of Curriculum and Assessment, 1, 10-12.
Pumfrey, P.D. (1985). Reading: Tests and assessment techniques (2nd ed.). Sevenoaks, Kent: Hodder and Stoughton.
Silver, A.A., Hagin, R.A., & Beecher, R. (1981). A program for secondary prevention of learning disabilities: Research in academic achievement and in emotional adjustment. Journal of Preventive Psychiatry, 1, 77-87. Slavin, R.E., Madden, N.A., Karweit, N.L., Dolan, L., Wasik, B.A., Shaw, A.,
Mainzer, K.L., & Haxby, B. (1991). Neverstreaming: Prevention as an alternative to special education. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 6, 373-378.
Spelman, B.J., & McHugh, B.A. (1994). Belfield Infant Assessment Profile: Teacher's handbook and resource manual. Dublin: Folens.
Stanovich, K.E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-407.
Stanovich, K. E. (1993-94). Romance and reality. Reading Teacher, 47, 280-291.
Stierer, B. (1990). Assessing children at the start of school: issues, dilemmas and current developments. The Curriculum Journal, 1, 155-169.
Wasik, B.A., & Slavin, R.E. (1993). Preventing early reading failure with one to-one tutoring. A review of five programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 178-200.
Wolfendale, S., & Bryans, T. (1979). Identification of learning difficulties: A model for intervention. Stafford, England: National Association for Remedial Education.
Young, D. (1968). The Group Reading Test. Seven Oaks, Kent: Hodder & Stoughton.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors contributing to REACH: Journal of Inclusive Education in Ireland retain the copyright of their article and at the same time agree to publish their articles under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License allowing third parties to share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format under the following terms:
- Attribution (BY): You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial (NC): You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- NoDerivatives (ND): If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
Learn more about Creative Commons licensing.
