Where We Were Then: An Illuminative Evaluation of Teacher Knowledge, Beliefs and Practices in Relation to Level 2 Learning Programmes and Inclusion in a Mainstream Post Primary School

Authors

  • Margaret Flood
  • Anna Logan

Keywords:

professional development, L2LP, post primary, inclusion, curriculum

Abstract

This article  reports  the findings of the first phase  of a case study  exploring the impact of collaborative whole-school professional development (CPD) to enact Level 2 Learning Programmes (L2LPs) in a mainstream post-primary school      In Phase 1 a baseline in relation to the school’s existing engagement with and knowledge, practice and beliefs around L2LPs and inclusion was established in order to ascertain the staff  CPD needs and inform the subsequent design, implementation and evaluation of the whole-school professional development in  phase two which are reported elsewhere ( Author 1, 2019).     Though the research explored the voices of students, parents, teachers and SNAs this article  will focus on teachers’ perspectives and practices.   Sixteen teachers, including the principal and SEN coordinator participated in phase one of the research. The findings suggest that despite a stated commitment to inclusion, there were  significant gaps in   teachers’ knowledge and understanding of  policy in relation to L2LPs and of how to plan for and implement level two learning programmes in their classroom practice.       

References

Cheng, Y.C. (2005). A Comprehensive Framework for Analysis of Education Reform Policy. In: New Paradigm for Re-engineering Education. Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht

Cheng, Y.C. & Cheung, W.M. (1995). A framework for the analysis of educational policies. International Journal of Educational Management, 9(6), 10-21. doi: 10.1108/09510147538

Department of Education and Science. (2007a). Inclusion of students with special educational needs, post-primary guidelines. Dublin, Ireland: The Stationary Office

Forlin, C., & Lian, M-G.J. (2008). Contemporary trends and issues in education reform for special and inclusive education in the Asia-Pacific region. In C. Forlin & M-G. J.Lian (Eds), Reform, inclusion and teacher education: towards a new era of special and inclusive education in Asia-Pacific regions. (p. 3-12). Abingdon, Australia: Routledge.

Gilson , L. (2015). Michael Lipsky, ‘Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public service’. In S.J. Balla, M. Lodge & P. Edwards, (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Classics in Public Policy and Administration. Retrieved from: http://researchonline.Ishtm.ac.uk/2305355/1/Gilson%20-%20Lipsky%27s%20.

Koutrouba, K., Vamvakari, M., & Theodoropoulos, H. (2008). SEN students’ inclusion in Greece: factors influencing Greek teachers’ stance. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 23(4), 413-421. doi: 10.1080/08856250802387422

Lipsky, M. (1981). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, U.S.A.: Russell Sage Foundation.

Maxwell, G.S. (1984). A Rating Scale for Assessing the Quality of Responsive/Illuminative Evaluations. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 6(2), 131-138. Doi: 10.2307/1163908

National Council for Curriculum and Assessment. (2007). Guidelines for teachers of students with general learning disabilities. Retrieved from http://www.ncca.oe/uploadedfiles/Overview_web.pdf

National Council for Curriculum and Assessment. (2016). Level 2 learning programmes: Guidelines for teachers. Retrieved from www.ncca.ie/en/Curriculum_and_Assessment/Inclusion/Special_Educational_Needs/Level_2_Toolkit/Guidelines_nc.pdf.

Opfer, V.D., & Pedder, D., (2011). Conceptualising teacher professional learning. American Educational Research Association, 81(3), 376-407. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/23014297

Parlett, M., & Hamilton, D.(1972). Evaluation as illumination: A new approach to the study of innovatory programs. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED167634.pdf

Rouse, M. (2007). Enhancing effective inclusive practice: Knowing, doing and believing. Wellington: New Zealand Ministry of Education

Rouse, M. (2008). Developing inclusive practice: A role for teachers and teacher education. Education in the North, 16(1), 6-13. Retrieved from https://abdn.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/developing-inclusive-practice-a-role-for-teachers-and-teacher-edu

Shevlin, M., Winter, E., & Flynn, P. (2013). Developing inclusive practice: teacher perceptions of opportunities and constraints in the Republic of Ireland. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(10), 1119-1133. doi: 10.1080/13603116.2012.742143

Downloads

Published

2021-12-09

How to Cite

Flood, M. ., & Logan, A. . (2021). Where We Were Then: An Illuminative Evaluation of Teacher Knowledge, Beliefs and Practices in Relation to Level 2 Learning Programmes and Inclusion in a Mainstream Post Primary School. REACH: Journal of Inclusive Education in Ireland, 34(2). Retrieved from https://reachjournal.ie/index.php/reach/article/view/315

Most read articles by the same author(s)